Robert Scoble has some great advice to anyone considering delivering partial versus full feeds. Robert and I hate partial text feeds. Lots of folks think it helps click through if you offer a partial feed. Feedburner suggests they are wrong. Robert explains why partial feeds are a bad idea even if there was a a difference in click through:
The thing that partial texters are forgetting is that the other 900 people will find out about you from an influencer. Someone who will tell them. So, your traffic growth will be far slower if you only offer partial text feeds. Many of my friends who are journalists or bloggers just won’t deal with partial text feeds anymore. You certainly see that I link to mostly full text feeds on my link blog.
John Battelle realized this after he polled his readership about this issue: “From the results of my very unscientific poll, I’d clearly be alienating at least a very vocal minority.”
April 20th, 2007 at 11:46 am
A. I agree.
B. The irony is that I’m reading and commenting through FeedDemon’s interface and that I came here from your post that was syndicated to CocialMediaToday WHICH ONLY OFFERS PARTIAL FEEDS!
April 21st, 2007 at 3:13 am
[...] Big in Japan: Providing Social Media Solutions » Blog Archive » RSS Feeds, partial or full? Was fürs Antibürokratieteam (tags: rss feeds atom blogs technologie) [...]